Current Status

On Tuesday 10 September, preliminary excavation works (including the demolition of a section of dry stone walling) were carried out close to Micklethwaite Bridge in the south west corner of the Greenhill site and a site compound area was created. GAG believes this work was undertaken by/on behalf of the Developers to enable the planning permission granted for the replacement swing-bridge to remain active. At this time, a number of Conditions relating to the bridge works are still to be fully discharged and, on behalf of the local communities, GAG is investigating these matters.   With respect to the Reserve Matters applicable to the main housing development (the 80+ documents for which were published on the BMDC Planning website on 12 August 2019) GAG is scrutinising these and will comment on their content in due course.
Outline planning consent for 420-440 houses was granted in September 2016 by the then Secretary of State, Sajiv Javid. At the same time, full planning permission was granted for the replacement of the current swing-bridge at Micklethwaite Lane with a new, two-lane swing bridge. Although in the period since September 2016 the Greenhill site was put up for sale by the developers (Redrow/Bellway) GAG is not aware of the site having changed ownership. In order to preserve the full planning permission that was granted for the new swing bridge a number of Conditions (included in the Inspector's Public Inquiry report of 2016) need to be discharged and on 6th June 2019 the developers submitted a number of documents to BDMC Planning Department relating to the replacement swing bridge at Micklethwaite Lane. On 20th June 2019, a leaflet from the developers was received by a number of residents who live around the edges of the Greenhill site, inviting comments on the proposed outline development plan, prior to an application for full planning permission being submitted. The deadline for comments to be received is Friday 28th June 2019. Even if a leaflet was not received, residents living in the area of the proposed development can still leave comments online for the developers by visiting their website

Outline planning consent for 420-440 houses was granted by the Secretary of State in September 2016, but with 40 conditions attached that the Developers must comply with in order to proceed with the full development. These cover many different areas including:

  • Pedestrian safety and road infrastructure changes
  • Travel disruption during replacement of the swing bridge at Micklethwaite Lane
  • Noise, disruption and management of on-site activity
  • Rainwater and foul water/sewage provision
  • Protection of existing environment and wildlife
  • Archaeological and historical aspects
  • Provision for additional school places required
  • Provision for increased pressure on emergency, medical and social services

We need to ensure that all the conditions are fully met in order that our community is not 'sold short'. In the coming months, the committee and members of Greenhill Action Group, will be working to scrutinise any actions that the Developer comes forward with and will report these to the community via this website, the mailing list and the Facebook page.

If you feel you can offer any help or have any expertise in the above-mentioned areas, we would be pleased to hear from you. In the first instance please contact Richard Kunz at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Latest News

  • Well, I did it !! The highest peaks of Scotland, England and Wales summited in a little over 24 hours (26 hours 14 minutes) to help raise funds for GAG. It really was a tough challenge – both physically and logistically but with added drama thrown in for good measure ...


    Saturday 22nd August: Ben Nevis
    We travelled up to Glen Nevis the night before so were ready to tackle the climb at 09:00 on Saturday morning. The weather was warm and humid for almost 3 miles before we went into mist at around 3,100 feet. Visibility deteriorated progressively up to the summit which we reached at 11:24. After a brief stop for GAG sponsor photo’s (Perfectly Clear drinks) and a drink, we pressed back down and were back at the minibus at 13:26: 9 miles, 4,409 feet in 4 hours 26 minutes.

    Saturday 22nd August: Ben Nevis – to Wasdale
    After a quick change and pack up, it was off to Wasdale in the minibus – 257 miles. Heavy rain started within minutes of departure and lasted pretty much all the way to Carlisle. The journey was slow thanks to a number of caravans that had created a slow procession all the way from Glencoe almost to Loch Lomond and a shortcut gamble to take the A5086 at Cockermouth back fired as the road had been closed at Pardshaw forcing an unplanned detour on various backroads to bypass the closure. We finally arrived at Wasdale at 19:48.

    Saturday 22nd August: Scafell
    We set out at 20:06 in fading light. The weather was dry and humid to start with but a storm warning had been forecast and the heavens opened at the ¼ mile mark with lightning the likes of which I hope I don’t see again while I’m stuck in the open! In darkness, we strayed off the track near the Brown Tongue turn off and zig-zagged the stream (now a torrent) on Lingmell Scars before reverting to making our own route – straight up the fell on our hands and knees to reach high ground at Hollow Stones then following a black route to the top: 3,208 feet. This had taken us 2 hours 43 minutes, almost an hour longer than our schedule due to a ¾ mile nightmare detour. After the briefest of stops (for sponsor photo’s) we headed back down – this time at a reduced pace to ensure we didn’t stray from the path. The storm prevailed and there were a few nasty slips on the path down despite slowing to a safe pace. We were back at the minibus at 00:59, wet to the core but mightily relieved to be back in one piece. This had taken nearly two hours longer than a daytime practice run two weeks previous.

    Saturday 22nd August: Wasdale to Snowdon
    In order for the minibus to get moving as quickly as possible, we changed out of our wet clothes on the move and wrapped up in blankets to dry off and get warm. The driver had picked a route over Hardknott Pass as a shortcut to help save time. At this stage, a shortcut was the only way we could keep our hope of the 24 hour target. As we neared the ¾ mark on Hardknott, the severity of the hill and weather got the better of us – the minibus couldn’t get any traction on the treacherous track. After much pushing in torrential rain, we managed to turn the minibus around to pick up a much safer route on the A595. Getting stuck and having to ‘U’ turn and divert had cost us almost another hour. No-one mentioned it, but we all knew the 24 hour dream had slipped out of our grip: this was now about finishing the peaks to protect much needed sponsorship and pride. We arrived at Pen Y Pass car park at 07:15. The weather was damp and cool.

    Sunday 23rd August: Snowdon
    We set out onto Snowdon at 07:28 and chose the Miners track as this was a faster route to get to Pyg Track at 3¼ miles (2,404 feet). We reached the summit (3,559 feet) at 09:51 with virtually no visibility due to heavy mist. After another photo stop we headed back down to Pen Y Pass – this time taking Pyg Pass all the way down. This route was 8 miles and had taken us 4 hours 48 minutes.

    And finally….
    After a brief café stop and a much needed hot drink we set off back to Bingley – exhausted but hugely pleased to have completed the challenge in such dreadful conditions and managed to snatch a brief sleep on the journey back. Three mountains totalling 22¾ miles (combining to 10,976 feet) walked in 14 hours 30 minutes. Thanks to some very kind sponsors and one significant corporate sponsor, Perfectly Clear drinks, I’ve raised around £2,000 for our much needed fighting fund. Not bad for a first attempt…..


  • On 31st October the National Planning Casework Unit issued a letter to Bradford Council advising them that they are NOT to grant planning permission on the Sty Lane application and that the Secretary of State has decided to call-in the application and to hold a Public Inquiry.
    This is excellent news for GAG. The Secretary of State has found in favour of GAG and against Bradford Council and the Developers.
    We now have only 6 weeks to present our initial statement of case and decide who to appoint to fight this for us. We cannot do this without your financial support and we need to ask you to dig deep again. We understand the timing is not good particularly in the run up to Christmas but we have no choice. The GAG committee will be meeting this week to formulate our strategy.
    Meantime if you are able to assist us financially please donate via our website or send to our Treasurer Graham Hey at Mickle Cottage, 12-16 Victoria Street, Micklethwaite, BD16 3JB.
  • The Planning Hearing was held on 19th June 2014 and unfortunately we lost. The vote went 5-2 in the developers favour.
    The hearing was a travesty. The handling of this whole episode has not been fair nor transparent. Many objections raised were not brought before the panel and the whole event was steamrollered through. There is more I could say but you will excuse me if we don’t publish them here as we are taking legal advice on our next steps. We are not crying foul because we lost as even 2 of the councillors on the committee requested the hearing be deferred because they did not believe Bradford Council had been fair and transparent in their handling of the meeting.
    Councillors Mark Shaw and David Heseltine did us proud as did all our speakers, Richard Pinchbeck, Richard Butler, Janet Payn, Tony Plumbe and Mick Meares. We had wonderful support from the community for the whole day. Thank you for all your support and for your donations.
    We need to consider next steps and as I understand it the only option open to us is a Judicial Review. We will take legal advice on this and the cost of doing so, but I believe there are a number of issues we can raise. In addition the chairman of the committee also said at the end of the meeting that whilst they have approved this application the housing site is only outline and the developers will need to bring forward a full application which we may wish to have an input on.
    We do need time to consider all of this but should you have any questions I will try to answer them. However please bear with us if you don’t get a speedy response as this is a new position we find ourselves in and we have lots of questions that we need to ask to aid our understanding.

In the Press

  • Regarding the piece in the Telegraph & Argus on November 11, any green belt land that can be saved is good, even if it is only a very small proportion.

    Greenhill Action Group has been telling the Council for four years that their calculated housing numbers are wrong, as they are using formulae that have historically produced 13,720 empty homes and we do not consider the current rethink goes far enough.
    Green belt does not save green fields, which have not been designated green belt but are still essential to the community’s wellbeing.
    This redistribution of housing numbers results in the City of Bradford having a nominal increase in housing of only two per cent with Airedale and South Pennine having an 18 per cent reduction against Wharfedale’s 45 per cent.
    In Bingley we have persuaded planning panel after planning panel that the planning submissions for Sty Lane, Micklethwaite, are flawed.
    We have also persuaded the public inquiry inspector and the Secretary of State on two occasions that the developers should not be building on our green fields.
    We are about to receive yet another planning submission over these green fields. How many times must we win before they cannot come back again?
    Councillor Slater may say they have listened, but have they really listened? What happened to localism?
    Terry Brown, Chairman, Greenhill Action Group Ltd